TD
TWIN DISC INC (TWIN)·Q4 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q4 FY25 delivered record sales of $96.7M, up 14.5% YoY, with gross margin reported at 31.0% (≈28% ex. one-time inventory capitalization), and EBITDA of $7.0M . Revenue beat consensus by ~$3.7M (+4.0%)* but EPS of $0.10 missed a $0.26 consensus*, driven by higher operating expenses and FX losses .
- Backlog rose to $150.5M (+$16.8M QoQ) on defense and propulsion strength; defense-related orders grew ~45% YoY and now comprise ~15% of backlog .
- Segment highlights: Marine & Propulsion +12.2% YoY to $53.0M, Industrial +82% to $13.1M; Land-Based Transmissions +4.5% to $26.1M .
- Oil & gas remained a drag (organic Q4 sales -8.4% YoY) due to lower China shipments, but first e-frac spread order (14 units; ~$2.3M) supports medium-term recovery .
- Management reiterated long-term targets (2030: ~$500M revenue, 30% GM, ≥60% FCF conversion) and guided FY26 capex of $12–14M; quarterly dividend maintained at $0.04 .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Strong top line and backlog momentum: Q4 sales +14.5% YoY to $96.7M; six‑month backlog reached $150.5M, up from $133.7M in Q3 .
- Defense & propulsion strength: CEO noted defense backlog and pipeline expansion (defense orders +~45% YoY; ~15% of backlog), with US Navy unmanned platforms and NATO land systems driving growth .
- Margin actions and underlying improvement: Reported Q4 gross margin of ~31.0% benefited from one-time inventory capitalization; underlying margin ~28% as cost actions and mix improved sequentially .
- Quote: “We closed out the fiscal year with our strongest quarter… Marine and Propulsion led the way with robust defense-driven demand…” (John Batten) .
What Went Wrong
- EPS miss despite revenue beat: Diluted EPS $0.10 vs $0.26 consensus*, impacted by FX losses, higher operating expenses and stock-based comp; EBITDA down YoY .
- Organic decline in Q4: Organic net sales fell 8.4% YoY (lower oil & gas shipments into China), highlighting continued energy market headwinds .
- Elevated operating costs: ME&A up 20.9% YoY to $24.6M in Q4 on acquisitions, professional fees, and wage inflation; one-time items and FX weighed on EBITDA .
Financial Results
Summary P&L, Margins, Cash, Backlog (oldest → newest)
Notes: Q4 gross margin lifted by one‑time Katsa inventory capitalization; underlying margin ~28% .
Q4 Year-over-Year
Segment Breakdown – Q4 FY25 vs Q4 FY24
KPIs and Balance Sheet Metrics
Guidance Changes
Note: No quantitative near‑term revenue/EPS/margin range was provided in the Q4 materials; commentary focused on backlog strength, defense pipeline, and cost/margin actions .
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- “We closed out the fiscal year with our strongest quarter… Marine and Propulsion led the way with robust defense‑driven demand… maintained pricing discipline and protected margins” (CEO) .
- “Fourth quarter gross margin improved… to 31%… Excluding the… inventory adjustment, gross margin was 28% for the quarter” (CFO) .
- “Defense… is really ramping up… approved supplier… for US Army, US Navy, and NATO… defense products grew ~45% YoY… nearly 15% of our backlog” (CEO) .
- “Tariff exposure [is] roughly 1% of cost of goods sold… pricing actions, alternative sourcing, and surcharge mechanisms… to offset” (CEO) .
- “Target… deliver 60% of EBITDA to free cash flow” (CFO) .
Q&A Highlights
- Defense ramp/capacity: Management plans to flex assembly across Finland, Belgium, Italy, and Texas to meet NATO/US Navy demand; sees “huge growth potential” in land and marine defense .
- Commercial synergies: Leveraging Twin Disc’s global distributor network to accelerate Veth/Katsa/Kobelt sales; cross‑selling controls, PTOs, and brakes through expanded channels .
- Oil & gas mix and e‑frac: Oil & gas ~8% of FY25 revenue (about half of a few years ago); first e‑frac spread order (14 units; ~$2.3M) and natural‑gas engine adaptations support recovery outlook .
- Margin drivers: Volume leverage, Katsa low‑cost gear production, supplier shifts (incl. India), and capex/lean initiatives underpin 2026 margin improvement plans .
- Capital allocation: FY26 capex $12–14M; prioritize deleveraging to re‑open capacity for “Katsa/Kobelt‑type” bolt‑ons; aim for ≥60% EBITDA‑to‑FCF conversion .
Estimates Context
- Q4 FY25: Revenue $96.678M vs consensus $93.0M* (+$3.68M, +4.0%); Diluted EPS $0.10 vs $0.26* (miss by $0.16)* .
- Q3 FY25: Revenue $81.242M vs consensus $83.4M* (−$2.16M, −2.6%); Diluted EPS $(0.11) vs $0.21* (miss by $0.32)* .
Values marked with an asterisk (*) are retrieved from S&P Global consensus via GetEstimates.
S&P Global consensus details: Primary EPS and Revenue estimates; 1 contributing estimate for each period*.
Implications: Expect upward revisions to revenue where defense/propulsion visibility is strong; EPS estimates may be recalibrated for higher ME&A, FX volatility, and lower oil & gas mix until margin actions flow through .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Defense and propulsion are the near‑term growth engines: backlog up to $150.5M with defense ~15% and pipeline of $50–$75M underscoring multi‑quarter visibility .
- Quality of beat/miss: Q4 revenue beat but EPS missed—higher operating costs and FX losses offset mix benefits; monitor underlying margin (~28% ex. one‑time) trajectory into FY26 .
- O&G stabilization with catalysts: First e‑frac order and NG engine adaptations offer upside as traditional oil & gas exposure sits at ~8% of FY25 revenue .
- Integration synergies should aid margins: Katsa low‑cost gear production, supplier shifts, and network cross‑sell are tangible levers; volume ramp in defense could accelerate flow‑through .
- Cash and balance sheet: Robust Q4 operating cash flow ($16.4M) and lower net debt QoQ ($15.3M) support capex and optionality; dividend maintained .
- Watch items: FX volatility, tariff costs (~1% of COGS), and China energy demand remain swing factors; management indicates mitigation levers in place .
- Trading setup: Narrative skew is positive on backlog/defense and underlying margins; EPS cadence hinges on cost normalization and conversion of defense pipeline to shipments .